The Colors Will Never Be The Same

Based on the documentary A.B.B, do you think all the vices committed by Julius Ceaser were necessary in order to safeguard the superirity of Rome as the greatest civilization in the ancient world?

Julius Ceaser was a legend. From the documentary, what he did to safeguard the superiority of Rome as the greatest civilization in the ancient world is indeed necessary because at that time there is no time like us now there is only war in order to achieve something back then using violation. Ceaser does not care what people say, he’s doing an immoral acts by sleeping all the wives of the senators to show to the other man that he is immortal and no one dares to fights him. He did that because he wants to show that he rules everything and to avoid the usurpation among the politician. The battle in Alesia had it reason itself; the reason why Ceaser let the enemy die with starvation is there is not enough food to supply for his army and his enemy, it is divide and conquer, he had to think for his army first and his safety. The chopping hands issues are a strategy to remind those who oppose the roman civilization is to fear the hearts and mind. In conclusions, even though Ceaser is evil, what he did is for his country is for their benefits, to protect the Rome itself. 

Do you agree that Brutus had a noble motive when murdering his adopted father, Julius Ceaser?

Based from the history events, Brutus is a noble man. He had the noble motive when he killed his own father, Julius Ceaser. He did that because he did not want the future to become worse when Ceaser reach the throne and become tyrant. There are reasons why Brutus did such thing. Ceaser is an evil man that could do anything in order to achieve power. He had done many an immoral acts towards the society plus he had slept with the senators’ wife and he did not show the good image of him for being a leader itself. Brutus had no intention of taking the power by killing his father, he just want to stop Ceaser from worsen. In conclusion, what he did is noble, but from the killing, many other man wants to take over the throne and it has become a fight and leads to civil war that cause Brutus own death.

What is the evidence that supports the claim that James Kelly was JTR? If you are a rival detective, how do you eliminate all the evidence that you've identified in the documentary?

I had watched “Jack the Ripper in America” and from my research about the case, James Kelly was the JTR. He was sent off to Asylum because he had killed his wife by stabbing her neck and the other five canonical were killed the same way. He had managed to escape from the asylum using old fashioned key in 1988. The murder does not happen when he is in the asylum. That shows he is the JTR obviously. Apart from that, what makes him expert in killing is the expertise of him in as a furniture upholsterer which is good in handling the knives. From my opinion, back then there was no technology that could trace a serial killer, but nowadays, there is lot of technologies that could trace a killer. For me, he is just insane person who is obsessed in killing.