The Colors Will Never Be The Same

Based on the documentary A.B.B, do you think all the vices committed by Julius Ceaser were necessary in order to safeguard the superirity of Rome as the greatest civilization in the ancient world?

Julius Ceaser was a legend. From the documentary, what he did to safeguard the superiority of Rome as the greatest civilization in the ancient world is indeed necessary because at that time there is no time like us now there is only war in order to achieve something back then using violation. Ceaser does not care what people say, he’s doing an immoral acts by sleeping all the wives of the senators to show to the other man that he is immortal and no one dares to fights him. He did that because he wants to show that he rules everything and to avoid the usurpation among the politician. The battle in Alesia had it reason itself; the reason why Ceaser let the enemy die with starvation is there is not enough food to supply for his army and his enemy, it is divide and conquer, he had to think for his army first and his safety. The chopping hands issues are a strategy to remind those who oppose the roman civilization is to fear the hearts and mind. In conclusions, even though Ceaser is evil, what he did is for his country is for their benefits, to protect the Rome itself. 

Do you agree that Brutus had a noble motive when murdering his adopted father, Julius Ceaser?

Based from the history events, Brutus is a noble man. He had the noble motive when he killed his own father, Julius Ceaser. He did that because he did not want the future to become worse when Ceaser reach the throne and become tyrant. There are reasons why Brutus did such thing. Ceaser is an evil man that could do anything in order to achieve power. He had done many an immoral acts towards the society plus he had slept with the senators’ wife and he did not show the good image of him for being a leader itself. Brutus had no intention of taking the power by killing his father, he just want to stop Ceaser from worsen. In conclusion, what he did is noble, but from the killing, many other man wants to take over the throne and it has become a fight and leads to civil war that cause Brutus own death.

What is the evidence that supports the claim that James Kelly was JTR? If you are a rival detective, how do you eliminate all the evidence that you've identified in the documentary?

I had watched “Jack the Ripper in America” and from my research about the case, James Kelly was the JTR. He was sent off to Asylum because he had killed his wife by stabbing her neck and the other five canonical were killed the same way. He had managed to escape from the asylum using old fashioned key in 1988. The murder does not happen when he is in the asylum. That shows he is the JTR obviously. Apart from that, what makes him expert in killing is the expertise of him in as a furniture upholsterer which is good in handling the knives. From my opinion, back then there was no technology that could trace a serial killer, but nowadays, there is lot of technologies that could trace a killer. For me, he is just insane person who is obsessed in killing. 

Aspect of the plot that is accurate to the historical fact in the Jack The Ripper murders and which aspect of the plot that is based on the filmmakers' own imagination. In Hell.

Inspector Frederick Abberline investigates the Ripper crimes. For me, the aspects for the plot that is accurate to the historical facts are the murder chain which includes 5 prostituted of women that are known each other. The killing was brutal and extremely consists of body parts that are torn apart. The way the killing by Jack the Ripper is a fact. The way the throat had been cut, and all of the victims are woman, which is prostitute. The plot that is based on filmmakers owns imagination is the love between the detective and the prostitute that want to know as “unfortunate”. Apart from that, the plot is about political such as the relationship between the duke and the prostitute and the duke is the ripper. Furthermore, the plot is using the Freemason theory which includes the ritual that is maybe superstitious. The film shows the detective is addicted to drugs and believes that he possesses supernatural power in him. 

SUPER SIZE ME

Do you feel insulted if people call you fat? What does it feels like? Is it your fault for being like that? Calories have been the fault for it if not else. Scientifically, calorie is a unit of energy-producing potential supplied by food and released upon oxidation by the body, equal to the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of 1 kilogram of water by 1°C at one atmosphere pressure. Based on the documentary that had been given that is “super size me”, I disagree that fast food is the cause of obesity around the world. It is not the fault of the owner of the fast foods because opening it, they just do their work, it’s their job to gain profit from it. We as a consumer should not blame them. Blame on ourselves instead. It is true that the man from the video did the experiment on himself to see whether fast foods bring bad effects towards us. He consumes fast foods for 30 days and ended up sick. From my point of view, eating fast food often does not cause obesity instantly, but it generates illness instantly and can cause death. The sickness that we can get is such as compilation to breathe, diabetes and other serious illness problem. What attract me more as a man is, do you ever want to end up cannot use your “strength” in bed to pleasure your loved ones? Such as in Malaysia, there are variety of foods that can bring obesity but we are not like the United States that are stated there are large number of fat people there.  It is up to ourselves to consume it or not. We are mature enough to know the good and bad thing. Yes fast foods are really delicious as we know, but can we avoid from it? Can we shut it down? It lies down on us whether to pick a healthy life or no.

ANCIENT ALIENS: THE EVIDENCE

UFO, flying saucer, laser gun, big eyes, what sorcery is that? Technically, scientifically, it is different in nature which is called “Alien”. Does anyone believe such thing? Some of our experts in this alien thing had discovered some of the evidence that shows they did visit our beloved called Earth. The evidence is shown in the documentary by History channel that called “Ancient Aliens: The Evidence”. As we can see from the video, most the place has taken at Egypt. How in the world the people of the ancient know the far greater technologies from us now? How they build the pyramid with such a big stone perfectly carved and lifted it to make an enormous pyramid? What attract me more is, they already made the perfect flying machine model and more advanced from us now. But, there are no actual flying machines that discovered yet and where the apparatus came from. The question is, where did the technologies came from? Some people stated that it came from the sky, the aliens. They stated that the aliens use their technologies to help the ancients. For me, I disagree with the alien’s thing. From my opinion, the people from the ancients are actually are far bigger than us and the Egyptian uses great number of slave to lift the stone and carved it. For the flying machine model part, I think it is coincidence because, imagine if we are little kids, and we saw the birds fly, of course we want to fly too. Based on my understanding, they are brilliant than us before. But unluckily, they did not manage to pass on the technologies to us now. It remains mystery.

Is Datuk Seri Najib continuing his father's legacy primarily in affirmative action

It’s has been 55 years now since Malaysia had Independence Day. I am sorry I am not good in political issues. But, do people really know the real date of Independence Day? Is Datuk Seri Najib continuing his father's legacy primarily in affirmative action? For me, Datuk Seri Najib is not continuing his father’s legacy. As we can see, Tun Abdul razak had done so many things in order to unite all the people. Then, 13^th May incident happened, he brace his self in order to settle the problem with going to China himself to meet President Mao even though people of Malaysian did not like him to risk his life to go there. From my opinion nowadays, the concept of 1 Malaysia that is launched by Datuk Seri Najib has weakened the Malays and Bumiputras. Actually, his father had done this before in a different way. It is just an attraction, it makes Malays looked weak. So many political parties nowadays destroy the nation that had been made by Tunku Abdul Razak before if we looked closely.

IS GANDHI FAILED IN HIS LIFE WORK WHICH IS TO PROMOTE NON-VIOLENCE AND REUNITING THE PEOPLE OF INDIA?

  ‘Mahatma’ means ‘the great’, his full name is Mahatma Mohandas Gandhi. For me, Gandhi did not fail to promote non-violence because he is stubborn. He wants India free from the British.  His efforts to unite them all are amazing. People of India loved him so much and they stopped doing violent things in order to tells Gandhi to stop from fasting because of the violence occur. He had totally united all of the people to stand to the ground and make India achieve independence. He told to all people of India to let the Englishmen hit them and don’t hit back. Gandhi wants to make they feel guilty, humanity inside themselves and think of what they do is wrong. Everyone deserves equality not racism. 

IS GANDHI RESPONSIBLE TOWARDS THE TRAGIC END OF HIS ELDEST SON, HARILAL?

Gandhi My Father is a great movie, full of crisis between the families. His eldest son Harilal, does not make it in his life like he wanted to be like his father, a great barrister. For me, Gandhi has nothing to do with the tragic end of his eldest son because Gandhi has already warned him so many time but he never listen. It is up to us to make a wise decision to choose a good or a bad way. His father Gandhi, had offered him helped like Gandhi friend’s give him a job when Harilal is in trouble but he take advantage towards his new job. He uses his father’s name to achieve money. And use the money for nothing like drinking alcohol. And because of love of Gandhi towards his son, he still wants Harilal to be with them, but he refuses to, he is too ashamed towards his father’s name. 

Does Sherlock Holmes is an empathize person? why?

Fictional detective created by Scottish Author and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle named as Sherlock Holmes is a "consulting detective" whose abilities is beyond normal human being to be think of. He uses logical reasoning, his ability to solve difficult cases. The subject is, does Sherlock Holmes is an empathize person? Why? For me, i deeply agree that Sherlock is empathize person, because in every cases, every move he made he uses his brain to think well. As we know there are two part of the brain which is the left brain and the right brain. For the left brain we assume something and for the right brain it empathize it. He empathize every single detail in order to solve something. As we can see, on the case of "study in a pink" the Sherlock's movie, a normal person, they must have assumed and sees the case lightly. The example that can be given in the movie is the person died because she had committed suicide. Actually, the person is killed by a serial killer. Sherlock had putted himself as the victim in order to determine the consequences that might happened to her. He tried to consider on so many things even the smallest thing. Based on his forensics skills, he knew that the victim does not committed suicide, in fact she was killed. Some examples are why the coat's that the victim is wearing is wet? Why her nails full of dirt? There must be something on it and it is not accidentally happened. Not every person in this world can empathize with the situations that occurred. Sherlock Holmes is a sociopath and genius person.

Several Eureka Moment

Our brain is a powerful mind that can control universe. It is just how and the way to use it wisely. It can turn things to bad and good things. It depends on ourselves on how we manage our mind. What i learned from "Test your brain" the documentary that had been made by National Geographic that had been given by my lecturer is really astonishing. The videos had awakened my mind to think more, deeply and to make good decisions. Eureka moment is originally a word from Greek and it means "I’ve got it". Several eureka moments that i can give from the video are the tricks that had been made by the expert magician on the first test of the video. At first, i did not notice the hat that the magicians are wearing and the background had changed in front my eyes. Now I realized how easy our brain can be tricked. The magicians were just using the focus of our brain towards something in order to trick us. Other than that, the second test that i shocked is i did not realize the mascots just passing by and did not notice it at all. That shows that our brain is limited towards multitask job to do in order to focus on something. From the video, i experience new things, eureka moment appears from that. Mind is a powerful weapon; it can be used to do good and bad things.